From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p0PNUT9o102731 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:30:29 -0600 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 50BD7291AA6 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id zob5aGBIQ3l8N664 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948D06C0A8 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:32:52 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4D3F5DA4.3070809@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:32:52 -0600 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: version dependency question List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Is the delaylog fstab mount option dependent on anything external to the kernel, such as the mount command, or xfsprogs? Do these need to be updated to take advantage of '-o delaylog'? I'm currently running vanilla 2.6.34.1 underneath Debian Lenny, whose mount and xfsprogs (and everything for that matter) are quite old. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs