From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Logtenberg Subject: Re: version (was: btrfs, broken design?) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:13:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4D3FF3C0.5060505@logtenberg.eu> References: <201101211532.56140.diegocg@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: diegocg@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201101211532.56140.diegocg@gmail.com> List-ID: On 01/21/2011 03:32 PM, Diego Calleja wrote: > On Viernes, 21 de Enero de 2011 10:54:00 Helmut Hullen escribi=F3: >=20 >> And I never have seen somethin like "Changelog" - that would be fine= =20 >> too. >=20 > Check the wiki, I keep that updated: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/in= dex.php/Main_Page#News I like the Changelog on the wiki [1] very much, since it shows the most important changes in easily understandable language. Unfortunately, the most recent change is 2.6.35 (august 2010), while we are currently at 2.6.37 (stable) and 2.6.38-rc2 (mainline). Especially 2.6.38(-rc2) contains many interesting new btrfs features and lots of important fixes. It would be very nice if the Changelog could list/explain those. [1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog The News [2] section on the Main page does mention one more version, 2.6.37. But the news section is less elaborate than the Changelog and also I notice that 2.6.36 is not mentioned in the News section. Still, 2.6.36 does contain all kinds of btrfs-related changes. [2] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News Diego, pls don't read anything negative in my comments, I enjoy and respect your work very much! If you could find time to add those latest changes to the wiki, it would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Erik. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html