From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33293 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pi3EB-0000UK-Bm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:07:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pi3E9-0001RE-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:07:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:42065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pi3E9-0001Qt-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:07:53 -0500 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so799835wyg.4 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:07:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D400080.7080501@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:07:44 +0100 From: Stefano Bonifazi MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-user: relocating target code weakness References: <4D3D63B3.1030402@gmail.com> <4D3DD713.10405@twiddle.net> <4D3DF2A9.3080609@gmail.com> <4D3E292E.9090001@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: <4D3E292E.9090001@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: QEMU Developers On 01/25/2011 02:36 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 01/24/2011 01:44 PM, Stefano Bonifazi wrote: >> Wow wonderful! So you fixed the code for PIC (ET_DYN) support? > Yes. > >> how can I get your sources? > I was mistaken -- a later version of the patch set was in fact merged. > I simply forgot to delete my working branch afterward. > > > r~ Hi! I tested succesfully the sources with your fixes (though it remains the little problem of ld.so.1 path)! Even my final goal of having more than one instance of qemu-user running in the same address space worked fine using pie code after your fixes! Man I really own you a big thank you! :) Though I was on the right way, I'd surely take very long for doing the same fixes, and I have got a very short deadline! You almost saved me! :) I dunno where you are from, but if you happen to visit Rome you have a dinner paid! :D Again many thanks and best regards! Stefano B. P.S. Please just answer that last question, whether it is possible to have a variable showing the upper bound of heap (some brk_end) for a target process