From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753995Ab1AZTbr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:31:47 -0500
Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:59510 "EHLO
	ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753661Ab1AZTbp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:31:45 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAL0FQE1Ld/sX/2dsb2JhbAAMhAbNb5EDgSODOHQEhRc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,381,1291611600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="89334381"
Message-ID: <4D4076A0.9090805@teksavvy.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:31:44 -0500
From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils
 ?
References: <20110125053117.GD7850@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D3EB734.5090100@redhat.com> <20110125164803.GA19701@core.coreip.homeip.net> <AANLkTi=1Mh0JrYk5itvef7O7e7pR+YKos-w56W5q4B8B@mail.gmail.com> <20110125205453.GA19896@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D3F4804.6070508@redhat.com> <4D3F4D11.9040302@teksavvy.com> <20110125232914.GA20130@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20110126020003.GA23085@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D403855.4050706@teksavvy.com> <20110126164359.GA29163@core.coreip.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110126164359.GA29163@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 11-01-26 11:44 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
..
>> Nope. Does not work here:
>>
>> $ lsinput
>> protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537)
>>
> 
> It would be much more helpful if you tried to test what has been fixed
> (hint: version change wasn't it).

It would be much more helpful if you would revert that which was broken
in 2.6.36.  (hint: version was part of it).

The other part does indeed appear to work with the old binary for input-kbd,
but the binary for lsinput still fails as above.

Cheers