From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:33:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4076FD.6070207@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D405A9D.4070607@redhat.com>
On 11-01-26 12:32 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 26-01-2011 13:05, Mark Lord escreveu:
..
>> Nope. Does not work here:
>>
>> $ lsinput
>> protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537)
>
> You need to relax the version test at the tree. As I said before, this is
> a development tool from the early RC days, bound to work with one specific
> version of the API, and programmed by purpose to fail if there would by any
> updates at the Input layer.
..
As I said before, I personally have done that on my copy here.
But that's not what this thread is about.
This thread is about broken userspace courtesy of these changes.
So I am testing with the original userspace binary here,
and it still fails. And will continue to fail until that regression is fixed.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-23 17:03 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? Mark Lord
2011-01-24 17:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 0:32 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 0:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 4:13 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 4:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 4:37 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 4:43 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 4:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 5:04 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 5:07 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 5:15 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 5:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 6:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 14:42 ` Extending rc-core/userspace to handle bigger scancodes - Was: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 16:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 9:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 11:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 14:32 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 16:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 20:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 21:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 22:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 23:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 2:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 11:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 13:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 14:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 14:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 16:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 16:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 18:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 20:09 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 20:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:27 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 14:58 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 17:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 17:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:30 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 15:05 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 16:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:31 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:33 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2011-01-26 19:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:47 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 21:41 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 21:49 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 22:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 22:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 1:01 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 1:07 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 2:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 3:18 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 6:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 10:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-27 15:00 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 17:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 9:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 11:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 16:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 17:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 17:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 18:34 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:53 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 14:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 16:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:12 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 16:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:55 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:03 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 5:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 14:28 ` Mark Lord
2011-02-02 14:31 ` Chase Douglas
2011-02-02 16:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-02 20:00 ` Chase Douglas
2011-02-02 21:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-02-02 22:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4076FD.6070207@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.