From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38370 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pil8W-00053V-Ef
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:01:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1Pil8V-0006Mk-Cg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:01:00 -0500
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:51339)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1Pil8V-0006Lw-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:00:59 -0500
Message-ID: <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:00:54 +0300
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com>	<20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTi=H-Uc8Js7-PV_ceCZ99wiy6DVDvH1TqqyDhJL+@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=H-Uc8Js7-PV_ceCZ99wiy6DVDvH1TqqyDhJL+@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
[]
> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14.  Thanks to many
> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than
> ever, I believe.  For those who may object, it wouldn't affect
> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on.
> Besides, it is a good application of live migration.  By having
> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and
> optimization.

It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new
functionality into a "stable" branch.  Having nothing bad
against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new
functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released
before new year... ;)

I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can
be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape
and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges.

Mergeing it to a development branch is entirely another
question.

/mjt