From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Holler Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:34:40 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot v2010.12 released - Merge Window OPEN In-Reply-To: <20110126093936.3CE08CD1385@gemini.denx.de> References: <20101222201539.CDFF7EA652A@gemini.denx.de> <4D3E8855.4070003@ahsoftware.de> <20110125201716.BEB94B187@gemini.denx.de> <4D3F679F.6060406@ahsoftware.de> <20110126073801.11A43BB0B9@gemini.denx.de> <4D3FD89D.7000509@ahsoftware.de> <4D3FDD21.9000100@denx.de> <20110126093936.3CE08CD1385@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4D429BC0.9090506@ahsoftware.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello, Am 26.01.2011 10:39, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Stefano Babic, > > In message<4D3FDD21.9000100@denx.de> you wrote: >> >> If someone has interest can always resubmit a patchset to add the board >> again to mainline. This could be also an occasion to clean up ancient >> code ;-). > > Actually the first step would be as simple as a "git revert" for the > respective commit. Just to finally explain my reasoning to start this thread. My intention was to leave some code for still widely used boards visible in the sources. E.g. at the time I've started to modify u-board for a custom board, I've looked at the sources to find a similiar board and started to change the code for that. I would never have had a look at the repository to check if there once was a time where code for a similiar board was available. And the thoughts in a crufty place of my brain were escpecially about all the Atmel-boards. But it already seems some people found the time to start checking/fixing the code for them. Besides that I don't have had any arguments against removing code for unmaintained boards and I don't know how many and which long dead boards are resting in peace in the source (and since when). But the number of 100 is really impressive, so I think I'm wrong and I shouldn't have started this discussion. Regards, Alexander