From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39535 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PioSQ-0005ou-Dt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:33:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PioSP-0008MC-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:33:46 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:35482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PioSO-0008M7-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:33:45 -0500 Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so1186043gye.4 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:33:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:33:36 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com> <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Markus Armbruster , Yoshiaki Tamura , qemu-devel , Gerd Hoffmann On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > [] >> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many >> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than >> ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect >> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. >> Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having >> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and >> optimization. > > It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new > functionality into a "stable" branch. Having nothing bad > against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new > functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released > before new year... ;) > > I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can > be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape > and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Paolo