From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47968 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PirVp-0000la-1U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:49:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PirVk-0003ig-N8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:49:28 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:60119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PirVk-0003ia-KW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:49:24 -0500 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so3784496qyk.4 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:49:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D42F378.7080604@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:48:56 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <20110127182233.GB5228@redhat.com> <4D4293D6.2080802@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4D42C5B0.6000007@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel , Yoshiaki Tamura , Markus Armbruster , Gerd Hoffmann On 01/28/2011 07:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> [] >>> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many >>> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than >>> ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect >>> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. >>> Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having >>> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and >>> optimization. >> >> It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new >> functionality into a "stable" branch. Having nothing bad >> against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new >> functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released >> before new year... ;) >> >> I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can >> be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape >> and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. > > To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series > have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are > Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment > on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be > destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm > inclined to say no as well. No, I'd prefer not to take Kemari before the 0.14 freeze. It gives us a full release cycle for testing plus gives a nice headline feature for 0.15. > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be > applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Paolo >