From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:21:16 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] add gc-sections to TPL boot In-Reply-To: <1296238110.2918.87.camel@haiying-laptop> References: <1296190690-21146-1-git-send-email-Haiying.Wang@freescale.com> <1296190690-21146-5-git-send-email-Haiying.Wang@freescale.com> <20110128113646.4567b1fb@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <1296238110.2918.87.camel@haiying-laptop> Message-ID: <4D43091C.6020702@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Le 28/01/2011 19:08, Haiying Wang a ?crit : >> I see patch 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, and 7/7. Where are the rest? > Sorry, patch 7/7 is a wrong number here. I kept the patch # as 3/8/, > 4/8, 5/8, 8/8 to be consistent with the order in the patchset(v2) I > submitted in last December. I thought it would be clearer to compare > them with v2 version and review. Patch 1/8,2/8 have been applied by > Kumar, patch 6/8, 7/8 remain the same as v2 version. This patch, is a > new patch because that TPL still needs --gc-sections in linker option to > do partial link. > > If it is preferable to have new whole set of patch, I can reorder them > from 3/8-8/8 plus this one to submit. I would suggest to simply number patches from 1 to N for each version even if that means the same patch gets numbered differently across versions, because readers of a given version may not have read the previous one. A patchset should be self-sufficient and self-consistent IMO. Amicalement, -- Albert.