From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept
 FT migration incoming mode.
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:43:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com>
References: <1296199312-26334-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>	<1296199312-26334-20-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>	<4D42BD7D.8020004@redhat.com>	<AANLkTi=Q0R8fcL5M-wdLfoA_6Fwx4QX4mj5sLgSrHCo6@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42D601.9010905@redhat.com>	<AANLkTik5tt+o_Sp67TpGw9AZNyMpjK-vyn1VO+SVKo0z@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42DC5E.8060203@redhat.com>	<AANLkTimaAqcFipREj+XOdprfoL=Sy_nu=_=cjbjJZFD2@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42E37B.9010207@redhat.com> <AANLkTik0UsAcG7q9+EgEDMvG6XFAwaVzxQ2-iR7T8MST@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, dlaor@redhat.com,
	ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com,
	ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com,
	psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:39779 "EHLO
	mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751653Ab1A2KnV (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:43:21 -0500
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so4247452wwa.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:43:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik0UsAcG7q9+EgEDMvG6XFAwaVzxQ2-iR7T8MST@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 01/29/2011 10:31 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> OK, then while keeping "-incoming kemari:tcp:<host>:<port>" as a
> strong solution, could you please explain why placing the original
> parser under tcp handler wasn't a good idea?  With that,
> -incoming exec .*,ft_mode shouldn't be a problem.

But a hypothetical -incoming unix.*,ft_mode would have to be implemented 
twice.

Paolo

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43953 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pj8H4-0001lf-Kh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:43:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Pj8H3-0007LC-JG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:43:22 -0500
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:47656)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Pj8H3-0007L7-C4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:43:21 -0500
Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3938910wwi.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:43:15 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept
	FT migration incoming mode.
References: <1296199312-26334-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>	<1296199312-26334-20-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>	<4D42BD7D.8020004@redhat.com>	<AANLkTi=Q0R8fcL5M-wdLfoA_6Fwx4QX4mj5sLgSrHCo6@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42D601.9010905@redhat.com>	<AANLkTik5tt+o_Sp67TpGw9AZNyMpjK-vyn1VO+SVKo0z@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42DC5E.8060203@redhat.com>	<AANLkTimaAqcFipREj+XOdprfoL=Sy_nu=_=cjbjJZFD2@mail.gmail.com>	<4D42E37B.9010207@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTik0UsAcG7q9+EgEDMvG6XFAwaVzxQ2-iR7T8MST@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik0UsAcG7q9+EgEDMvG6XFAwaVzxQ2-iR7T8MST@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com

On 01/29/2011 10:31 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> OK, then while keeping "-incoming kemari:tcp:<host>:<port>" as a
> strong solution, could you please explain why placing the original
> parser under tcp handler wasn't a good idea?  With that,
> -incoming exec .*,ft_mode shouldn't be a problem.

But a hypothetical -incoming unix.*,ft_mode would have to be implemented 
twice.

Paolo