From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: Linearized 2.6.33.7-rt30 patch set available (with free coffee!) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:07:14 -0800 Message-ID: <4D475CC2.5080302@am.sony.com> References: <4D47242E.1000508@am.sony.com> <4D4725CF.6060008@windriver.com> <4D473046.8090009@am.sony.com> <4D474736.40703@windriver.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Rowand, Frank" , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: Received: from tx2ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.13]:15140 "EHLO TX2EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753147Ab1BABHo (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:07:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D474736.40703@windriver.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/31/11 15:35, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 11-01-31 04:57 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 01/31/11 13:12, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> On 11-01-31 04:05 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>>> Hi Paul, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the patch set! I had started down the path of doing >>>> the same work, and truly appreciate the effort you put into this. >>>> >>>> One of the patches had a chunk that failed to apply: >>>> >>>> genirq-support-forced-threading-of-interrupts.patch >>> >>> Interesting. I was using "git am" to apply them, and I can assure >>> you that they all applied with that (which is quite strict in its >>> checking.) >>> >>> What were you applying them with? >> >> quilt push -a > > OK, so it is simply a matter of quilt dying while git am is capable > of doing the right thing (see below for evidence). I'll re-export all > the patches on the v2.6.33-rt branch, which will fix you up. Should > be able to do that shortly -- check the gitweb page for activity on > the v2.6.33-rt branch, which is what you want to use. I'll watch for that and check it again. > > You do realize that by using quilt though, that you are throwing away > all the commit headers and the history, which is the whole point of > this tree existing? Yes. I do find great value in the history -- it is very informative. > You are just building up the original RT giant > diff one chunk at a time. Unless you are thinking or intending to > insert some other SCM into the quilt processing at each step, I don't > see the point of using quilt and doing a "push -a" I wasn't to the point yet of importing the patches into an SCM. I was just checking that the patches applied and that they are equivalent to the patch set you started with. Think of it as a simple consistency and paranoia check that a reviewer would do. I used quilt because it is a trivial manual method of applying all the patches, since they are nicely listed in the proper order in the series file. -Frank