From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDB84C8007E; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:01:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2011 12:01:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,411,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="883327839" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.170]) ([10.255.14.170]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2011 12:01:06 -0800 Message-ID: <4D486681.9030605@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:01:05 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <368409054248933ffd777fbd600a29670feeaa16.1296580694.git.bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> <4D485554.1030209@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, poky@yoctoproject.org, saul.wold@intel.com Subject: Re: [poky] [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto: export kernel configuration audit to the console X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:01:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/01/2011 11:09 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 02/01/2011 09:25 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> >>> Fixes [BUGID #692] >>> >>> Previously the information dumped by the kernel configuration audit >>> scripts was only placed in log files. This isn't as useful as it >>> could be, since they are rarely checked. This change takes the >>> output from kconf_check and explicitly displays it to the user. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield >> >>> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >>> b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >>> index 0c3aa9a..ac0de6a 100644 >>> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >>> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >> >>> -SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto ?= "8a49ef6f1a43dabbce34a9ee9a1be08b26fc511c" >>> +SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto ?= "e8b8c1ae44932835f4f79e77180d3ce5e4b1ec99" >> >> Was this an intentional change? It wasn't clear to me above which bits >> necessitated a linux-yocto-2.6.37/meta SRCREV change. > > Good catch, and typically that would have been a mistake. That's > me updating the captured scripts to have the updated kconf_check > (among others), so it was intentional, but I did for get to mention it > in the submission email. Ah right, of course. Thanks! -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDB84C8007E; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:01:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2011 12:01:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,411,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="883327839" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.170]) ([10.255.14.170]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2011 12:01:06 -0800 Message-ID: <4D486681.9030605@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:01:05 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <368409054248933ffd777fbd600a29670feeaa16.1296580694.git.bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> <4D485554.1030209@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, poky@yoctoproject.org, saul.wold@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto: export kernel configuration audit to the console X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:01:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/01/2011 11:09 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On 02/01/2011 09:25 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> >>> Fixes [BUGID #692] >>> >>> Previously the information dumped by the kernel configuration audit >>> scripts was only placed in log files. This isn't as useful as it >>> could be, since they are rarely checked. This change takes the >>> output from kconf_check and explicitly displays it to the user. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield >> >>> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >>> b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >>> index 0c3aa9a..ac0de6a 100644 >>> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >>> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >> >>> -SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto ?= "8a49ef6f1a43dabbce34a9ee9a1be08b26fc511c" >>> +SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto ?= "e8b8c1ae44932835f4f79e77180d3ce5e4b1ec99" >> >> Was this an intentional change? It wasn't clear to me above which bits >> necessitated a linux-yocto-2.6.37/meta SRCREV change. > > Good catch, and typically that would have been a mistake. That's > me updating the captured scripts to have the updated kconf_check > (among others), so it was intentional, but I did for get to mention it > in the submission email. Ah right, of course. Thanks! -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel