From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45049 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlNjk-0006Nd-An
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:38:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1PlNji-0005Cf-ID
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:38:16 -0500
Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:59230)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1PlNji-0005CQ-Fs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:38:14 -0500
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1507166vws.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D4C1D5E.2000905@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:38:06 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] Missing patches (mostly fixes)
References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com>
	<4D49B04F.80201@mail.berlios.de>	<4D4BF160.9040500@codemonkey.ws>
	<m3ei7nvmz1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <m3ei7nvmz1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 02/04/2011 09:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  writes:
>
>    
>> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>      
> [...]
>    
>>> [PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
>>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
>>>        
>    
>>> [PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
>>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79946/)
>>>        
>> Luiz
>>      
> I wouldn't bother with the second one for 0.14.  Yes, we're reading
> lines from a file with %s, but it's a fixed file with known contents, no
> long lines, and we're reading it in a test program only developers ever
> use.
>
> As to the first one, Luiz has never touched that file.  Neither have I,
> and it's not obvious to me why it should go into 0.14.
>    

Yeah, I just meant the qdict one.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> [...]
>
>