From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Pipping Subject: Re: "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4? Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:49:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4D4F33A3.7060002@hartwork.org> References: <4D4DEDC4.4080708@hartwork.org> <20110206051333.GA3458@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4D4EF7E4.7050303@hartwork.org> <20110206231914.GA8147@neumann> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Matthieu Moy , Jeff King , Git ML To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?SZEDER_G=E1bor?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 07 00:50:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PmEMt-0001uS-G6 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:50:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754189Ab1BFXuD convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:50:03 -0500 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.24]:44312 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754149Ab1BFXuB (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:50:01 -0500 Received: from [85.177.91.128] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1PmEMd-00072x-H2; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:49:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110103 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <20110206231914.GA8147@neumann> X-Df-Sender: hartwork@binera.de Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 02/07/11 00:19, SZEDER G=E1bor wrote: > And others are bitten by it every once in a while. Yes, myself > included ;) Maybe this is also one of those things that might be > reconsidered for 1.8.0? >=20 >>> Could it be it has been working from anywhere before? >> >> Can you post an example where Git 1.7.4 and a previous version behav= e >> differently? Up to now, I see difference between your expectations a= nd >> what Git does, but not between new and old versions. >=20 > git add -u was tree-wide when it was introduced in dfdac5d (git-add > -u: match the index with working tree., 2007-04-20), but 2ed2c22 > (git-add -u paths... now works from subdirectory, 2007-08-16) broke i= t > while fixing something related. So my memory didn't fool me. Thanks for digging this out. Can we have tree-wide "git add -u" back, please? Thanks, Sebastian