From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754681Ab1BIRKt (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:10:49 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:7349 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753636Ab1BIRKs (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:10:48 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,446,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="601010298" Message-ID: <4D52CA98.2050100@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:10:48 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy Dunlap CC: Linus Torvalds , x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (test_nx: BUG) References: <20110209090804.5c1ecf8e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20110209090804.5c1ecf8e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/9/2011 9:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > test_nx BUGs. > CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y > (nearly allmodconfig, with a few changes) > > Is that expected? > this test should pass... so something broke it (I'll call that a success for the test ;-)