From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <saul.wold@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21])
	by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469654C8009E
	for <poky@yoctoproject.org>; Wed,  9 Feb 2011 19:22:05 -0600 (CST)
Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19])
	by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2011 17:22:04 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,448,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="386638939"
Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.122]) ([10.255.14.122])
	by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2011 17:22:04 -0800
Message-ID: <4D533DBB.8020302@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:22:03 -0800
From: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre
	Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: poky@yoctoproject.org
References: <4D533BCA.9000902@mlbassoc.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D533BCA.9000902@mlbassoc.com>
Subject: Re: git tarballs gone?
X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion <poky.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/poky>,
	<mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky>
List-Post: <mailto:poky@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky>,
	<mailto:poky-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:22:05 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/09/2011 05:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I just noticed that with the new fetcher, git tarballs are
> no longer being created.
> * Is this expected?
Not expected.

> * Can it be [re]enabled? This is a great help to me so I
> can distribute pre-staged sources to my customers. Tarballs
> are much more convenient than .git repositories.
>
I will be looking into this shortly.

Sau!

> Thanks
>