From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Goldish Subject: Re: [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] KVM test: refactor kvm_config.py Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:55:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4D53C412.9070003@redhat.com> References: <1297216207-28375-1-git-send-email-mgoldish@redhat.com> <20110209160603.GO4914@us.ibm.com> <20110209162107.GG3933@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20110209233101.GG26301@us.ibm.com> <4D53AC5D.4070507@redhat.com> <4D53BF23.6040808@redhat.com> <4D53C203.4000808@redhat.com> <4D53C25B.3010008@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, Uri Lublin , Eduardo Habkost , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D53C25B.3010008@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org Errors-To: autotest-bounces@test.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/10/2011 12:47 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/10/2011 12:46 PM, Michael Goldish wrote: >> On 02/10/2011 12:34 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> > On 02/10/2011 11:14 AM, Michael Goldish wrote: >> >> only Fedora..boot >> >> >> > >> > So this would include Fedora.9.32.boot and Fedora.9.64.boot, but >> exclude >> > Windows.XP.32.boot or Fedora.9.32.migrate? seems reasonable. >> >> Correct, and it would also include boot.Fedora.9.32 and >> boot.9.32.Fedora, if there were such things. > > That's counterintuitive and requires careful planning. I can't easily think of a case where this might cause confusion. The purpose of this is to allow people to write: only qcow2..raw..rtl8139 without having to remember the order in which those were defined in tests_base.cfg.