From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Goldish Subject: Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] KVM test: refactor kvm_config.py Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:57:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4D53C4A4.6070700@redhat.com> References: <1297216207-28375-1-git-send-email-mgoldish@redhat.com> <20110209160603.GO4914@us.ibm.com> <20110209162107.GG3933@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20110209233101.GG26301@us.ibm.com> <4D53AC5D.4070507@redhat.com> <4D53BF23.6040808@redhat.com> <4D53C203.4000808@redhat.com> <4D53C25B.3010008@redhat.com> <4D53C412.9070003@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, Uri Lublin , Eduardo Habkost , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16751 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752431Ab1BJK53 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:57:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D53C412.9070003@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/10/2011 12:55 PM, Michael Goldish wrote: > On 02/10/2011 12:47 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 02/10/2011 12:46 PM, Michael Goldish wrote: >>> On 02/10/2011 12:34 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>>> On 02/10/2011 11:14 AM, Michael Goldish wrote: >>>>> only Fedora..boot >>>>> >>>> >>>> So this would include Fedora.9.32.boot and Fedora.9.64.boot, but >>> exclude >>>> Windows.XP.32.boot or Fedora.9.32.migrate? seems reasonable. >>> >>> Correct, and it would also include boot.Fedora.9.32 and >>> boot.9.32.Fedora, if there were such things. >> >> That's counterintuitive and requires careful planning. > > I can't easily think of a case where this might cause confusion. The > purpose of this is to allow people to write: > > only qcow2..raw..rtl8139 > > without having to remember the order in which those were defined in > tests_base.cfg. Sorry, I meant something like only qcow2..hugepages..rtl8139 Obviously qcow2 and raw can't coexist.