From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:58:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D54D704.3060508@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4CF506.5090902@free.fr>
Hello Wolfgang, Albert,
On Saturday 05 February 2011 12:28 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a ?crit :
>
>> On second thoughts I would like to keep the entire bss in SDRAM. With
>> MMC and FAT support, the SPL is already nearing the IRAM budget in
>> OMAP3. It helps to save some space by moving out bss to SDRAM.
>>
>> If needed, I can fix up the start.S by defining something like
>> _end_of_data. But is that really needed. I do not see any SPL that
>> needs relocation and SDRAM bss at the same time.
>
> "Patches Welcome" :) -- with added thanks for patching all start.S /
> u-boot.lds in the ARM arch consistently.
I see __u_boot_cmd_end as the end of the image to be relocated in all
the scripts. Shall I use this label for this purpose. This will work
for now and save me from touching all those linker scripts. However,
there is a small possibility of this leading to the same problem as
with __bss_start in future. I don't think that should be a big concern.
Do you agree?
Best regards,
Aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 5:23 [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues Aneesh V
2011-02-01 6:52 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 7:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 8:26 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 8:35 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 10:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 10:18 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 10:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-01 12:43 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 13:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 10:53 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 21:16 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-02-11 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-13 21:40 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-09-28 20:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-12 6:13 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 7:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-01 7:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-01 8:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 8:27 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 7:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 8:18 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 8:48 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 10:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-02 13:17 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-02 13:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-02 14:01 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-02 15:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-03 10:38 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-05 6:58 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 6:28 ` Aneesh V [this message]
2011-02-11 6:39 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 6:57 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-11 8:15 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 8:27 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-02 21:01 ` Graeme Russ
2011-02-03 7:01 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-03 10:05 ` Graeme Russ
2011-02-03 6:49 ` sughosh ganu
2011-02-03 7:22 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-15 8:44 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D54D704.3060508@ti.com \
--to=aneesh@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.