From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 13:26:14 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc, mgcoge: add DIP switch detection
In-Reply-To: <20110506101716.D80C7D60EB7@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1295951175-3635-1-git-send-email-holger.brunck@keymile.com>
	<20110504200122.2824B126DAA@gemini.denx.de>
	<4DC24DEA.7010201@keymile.com>	
	<20110505072913.2D655D5F849@gemini.denx.de>
	<4DC253A5.6010109@keymile.com>
	<20110505181654.AD524D60EB7@gemini.denx.de>
	<4DC3AD11.5080509@keymile.com>
	<20110506101716.D80C7D60EB7@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4DC3DAD6.4090903@keymile.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 05/06/2011 12:17 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> So back to my original question should I post a bugfix patch for the compile
>> issue for mgcoge2ne and rebase the serie "[PATCH v2 0/7] km82xx mainlining"
>> above this patch or is it ok if it get fixed with this serie?
> 
> If it's not too much of effort, I'd appreciate a separate bug fix,
> which I can pull without longer review.  Thanks!
> 

Ok done. If the patch was ok and pulled, I send an rebased serie for
[PATCH 0/7] km82xx mainlining

Best regards
Holger Brunck