All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86, cpu: Add CPU flags for SMEP
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:56:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD1D5EB.3070602@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305581685-5144-2-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

On 05/16/2011 02:34 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> 
> Add support for newly documented SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Protection) CPU
> feature flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c   |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 50c0d30..e773f13 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PLN		(7*32+ 5) /* Intel Power Limit Notification */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PTS		(7*32+ 6) /* Intel Package Thermal Status */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_DTS		(7*32+ 7) /* Digital Thermal Sensor */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SMEP	(7*32+ 8) /* Supervisor Mode Execution Protection*/
>  
>  /* Virtualization flags: Linux defined, word 8 */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_TPR_SHADOW  (8*32+ 0) /* Intel TPR Shadow */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> index c7f64e6..2de3aea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ void __cpuinit init_scattered_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_PTS,		CR_EAX, 6, 0x00000006, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF,	CR_ECX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_EPB,		CR_ECX, 3, 0x00000006, 0 },
> +		{ X86_FEATURE_SMEP,		CR_EBX, 7, 0x00000007, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT,		CR_EAX,	0, 0x0000000d, 1 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_CPB,		CR_EDX, 9, 0x80000007, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_NPT,		CR_EDX, 0, 0x8000000a, 0 },

The level 7 flags are not considered "scattered"; they have their own
word; please use it.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-17  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-16 21:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature Fenghua Yu
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86, cpu: Add CPU flags for SMEP Fenghua Yu
2011-05-17  1:56   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86, cpu: Add SMEP CPU feature in CR4 Fenghua Yu
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP Fenghua Yu
2011-05-17  2:10   ` Matthew Garrett
2011-05-17 23:08     ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-17 23:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-18  2:57         ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/kernel/common.c: Disable SMEP by kernel option nosmep Fenghua Yu
2011-05-16 22:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-16 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-17  7:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  9:15     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17  9:29       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  9:32         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 10:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17 11:34             ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 11:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17 11:44                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 11:47                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 11:49                     ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-17 11:50                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19  6:10               ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-19  6:41                 ` Shan, Haitao
2011-05-20  8:21                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  9:16   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD1D5EB.3070602@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.