From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:64869 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752505Ab1ESPeD (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2011 11:34:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD53864.1010401@netapp.com> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:33:56 -0400 From: Bryan Schumaker To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] NFSD: added FREE_STATEID operation References: <1305575021-2841-1-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com> <1305575021-2841-2-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com> <20110518225609.GA26545@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20110518225609.GA26545@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On 05/18/2011 06:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:43:40PM -0400, bjschuma@netapp.com wrote: >> +static __be32 >> +nfsd4_free_file_stateid(stateid_t *stateid) >> +{ >> + struct nfs4_stateid *stp = search_for_stateid(stateid); >> + if (!stp) >> + return nfserr_bad_stateid; >> + if (stateid->si_generation != 0) { >> + if (stateid->si_generation < stp->st_stateid.si_generation) >> + return nfserr_old_stateid; >> + if (stateid->si_generation > stp->st_stateid.si_generation) >> + return nfserr_bad_stateid; >> + } >> + >> + if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, stp->st_stateowner)) >> + return nfserr_locks_held; > > I think this catches a lock stateid, but not an open stateid that has > associated lock stateid's that in turn hold locks. > > Hm, also: > > "The FREE_STATEID operation is used to free a stateid that no > longer has any associated locks (including opens, byte-range > locks, delegations, and layouts)" > > So an open stateid also shouldn't be freeable as long as there are opens > associated with it. So having an open stateid doesn't necessarily mean that the file is open? and having a lock stateid doesn't mean that the file is locked? I'll look at making a "check_for_opens()" function to help with this check. > > Also I guess a client shouldn't be permitted to free a delegation that > it still holds. That means we'll always just return nfserr_locks for > delegation stateid's. I assume free_stateid is only useful in this case Sounds simple enough. > for the case where a server forcibly revokes part of the client's state > and leaves some "stub" stateid's around in place of the revoked ones. > > --b.