From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNPHJ-0006Tj-5J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:58:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNPHI-00079M-AG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:58:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNPHI-00079I-09 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:58:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD66510.8070805@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:56:48 +0200 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DC7EEB0.3040007@redhat.com> <4DD66100.7000108@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] live snapshot, live merge, live block migration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Anthony Liguori , dlaor@redhat.com, Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel , Mingming Cao , Avi Kivity , Stefan Hajnoczi , Badari Pulavarty , Jiri Denemark , Eric Blake On 05/20/11 14:49, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> On 05/20/11 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> I'm interested in what the API for snapshots would look like. >> >> I presume you're talking external snapshots here? The API is really what >> should be defined by libvirt, so you get a unified API that can work >> both on QEMU level snapshots as well as enterprise storage, host file >> system snapshots etc. > > Thanks for the pointers on external snapshots using image files. I'm > really thinking about the libvirt API. > > Basically I'm not sure we'll implement the right things if we don't > think through the API that the user sees first. Right, I agree. There's a lot of variables there, and they are not necessarily easy to map into a single namespace. I am not sure it should be done either...... Cheers, Jes