All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@cfl.rr.com>
To: Pedro Gonnet <gonnet@maths.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding pthread_cond_wait/pthread_cond_signal latencies
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 16:48:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD82514.3070407@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305886116.10494.30.camel@laika>

On 05/20/2011 06:08 AM, Pedro Gonnet wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm currently working on a shared-memory parallel Molecular Dynamics
> simulation library (http://mdcore.sourceforge.net/) geared towards
> multi-core systems.
>
> The library uses pthreads (plus some OpenMP for some simple loops) and
> uses pthread_cond_wait and pthread_cond_signal to coordinate a group of
> worker threads.
>
> I've been profiling the library on different machines and kernels and
> have noticed that in many cases there are significant (several ms,
> measured with Intel's Vtune-thing) lags between calls to
> pthread_cond_signal and the waiting thread actually getting back to
> work.
>
> I've tried the Ubuntu -rt and -preempt kernels, and the whole simulation
> runs twice as slowly, despite following the advice given here:
>
>          https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/HOWTO:_Build_an_RT-application
>
> My question is the following: which kernel (or set of configuration
> options) will minimize these latencies? And if linux-rt is the answer,
> in what ways do I have to be careful when porting the simulation for
> this kernel?
>

Are you saying several ms latency from pthread_cond_signal to waking up a 
thread in pthread_cond_wait?

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-21 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 10:08 Question regarding pthread_cond_wait/pthread_cond_signal latencies Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-21 20:48 ` Mark Hounschell [this message]
2011-05-21 20:51   ` Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-21 21:40     ` Rolando Martins
2011-05-22  0:44     ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-05-22 11:34       ` Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-22 13:51         ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-05-22 18:37 ` Robert Schwebel
2011-05-20 11:15 Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-22 14:53 ` Armin Steinhoff
2011-05-22 15:18   ` Armin Steinhoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD82514.3070407@cfl.rr.com \
    --to=dmarkh@cfl.rr.com \
    --cc=gonnet@maths.ox.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.