From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Hellstrom Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 08:49:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sparc32,leon: PCI patches Message-Id: <4DDA1FA0.6080002@gaisler.com> List-Id: References: <4DB68838.1020304@gaisler.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB68838.1020304@gaisler.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: >From: Daniel Hellstrom >Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:22:33 +0200 > > > >>I agree that it is a better solution in that case and in other cases >>too. The problem will be for me to write a PCI Library in the limited >>context of the PROM, it is much more complex that writing a PCI host >>driver. The non-free PCI specification alone is heavy, compatibility >>between PCI revisions and then there is the bridge >>specification... ugg, I will probably have to leave that to the next >>generation :) >> >> > >I guess if it's really that bad we can merge your PCI changes for >now, please resubmit them. > > Thanks, it means a lot to us. >Julian: >When I looked at this earlier, I was thinking that we might want to >introduce a new KConfig variable, maybe CONFIG_LEON_PCI, to hide all >this stuff behind so we don't have to do any complicated ifdefery or >change any existing ifdefs. I will add a PCIC and a LEON_PCI Kconfig option that depends on !LEON/LEON and PCI, as julian/sam suggests. I'm busy at the moment with other stuff it a pity these problem wasn't brought forward until now, is the merge window open until the end of the week? Thanks, Daniel