From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mohan Pallaka Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add stubs for pwm operations Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:34:57 +0530 Message-ID: <4DDB90D9.1020902@codeaurora.org> References: <1305867584-31929-1-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> <4DD7CC83.1020700@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:42322 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754015Ab1EXLFE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 07:05:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DD7CC83.1020700@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Mohan Pallaka Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk Ping. Hi Russell, please take sometime to review this patch. Thanks, Mohan. On 5/21/2011 8:00 PM, Mohan Pallaka wrote: > On 5/20/2011 10:29 AM, Mohan Pallaka wrote: >> Chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes >> would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't >> have support for pwm, even though the chip is programmed >> to work in non-pwm mode. Add stubs for pwm functions to >> avoid compilation errors in these scenarios. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mohan Pallaka >> --- >> include/linux/pwm.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h >> index 7c77575..54877f6 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ >> >> struct pwm_device; >> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) >> /* >> * pwm_request - request a PWM device >> */ >> @@ -28,4 +29,26 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm); >> */ >> void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm); >> >> +#else >> + >> +struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label) >> +{ >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm) { } >> + >> +int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) >> +{ >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm) >> +{ >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm) { } >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_PWM */ >> #endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */ >> -- >> Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora >> Forum. > Hi Russell, please review this patch. > > --Mohan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mpallaka@codeaurora.org (Mohan Pallaka) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:34:57 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add stubs for pwm operations In-Reply-To: <4DD7CC83.1020700@codeaurora.org> References: <1305867584-31929-1-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> <4DD7CC83.1020700@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <4DDB90D9.1020902@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Ping. Hi Russell, please take sometime to review this patch. Thanks, Mohan. On 5/21/2011 8:00 PM, Mohan Pallaka wrote: > On 5/20/2011 10:29 AM, Mohan Pallaka wrote: >> Chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes >> would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't >> have support for pwm, even though the chip is programmed >> to work in non-pwm mode. Add stubs for pwm functions to >> avoid compilation errors in these scenarios. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mohan Pallaka >> --- >> include/linux/pwm.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h >> index 7c77575..54877f6 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ >> >> struct pwm_device; >> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) >> /* >> * pwm_request - request a PWM device >> */ >> @@ -28,4 +29,26 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm); >> */ >> void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm); >> >> +#else >> + >> +struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label) >> +{ >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm) { } >> + >> +int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) >> +{ >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm) >> +{ >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm) { } >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_PWM */ >> #endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */ >> -- >> Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora >> Forum. > Hi Russell, please review this patch. > > --Mohan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html