From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRV1B-0003sY-NK for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:54:21 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2011 12:51:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,299,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="9998413" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.70]) ([10.255.13.70]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2011 12:51:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:51:10 -0700 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <79A1BC44-8268-4177-BBC5-4A5B08BDC8B7@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> Cc: Koen Kooi , "poky@yoctoproject.org Project" , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [poky] [PATCH 0/7] User/group creation at preinstall X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:54:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/31/2011 12:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't >> have saved me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :) >> > Scott, > > I would agree with Koen, this is a oe-core change, not a Poky only > change, please resend this request to the oe-core list. Sure, I'll resend it to oe-core. That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine which list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Is this documented anywhere? Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7FF4C800C0 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 14:51:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2011 12:51:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,299,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="9998413" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.70]) ([10.255.13.70]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2011 12:51:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:51:10 -0700 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <79A1BC44-8268-4177-BBC5-4A5B08BDC8B7@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org Project" , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] User/group creation at preinstall X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:51:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/31/2011 12:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't >> have saved me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :) >> > Scott, > > I would agree with Koen, this is a oe-core change, not a Poky only > change, please resend this request to the oe-core list. Sure, I'll resend it to oe-core. That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine which list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Is this documented anywhere? Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center