From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:28:10 +0200 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] Add i18n infra-structure. In-Reply-To: <1306870631-27386-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> References: <1306870631-27386-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4DE5BFDA.2010404@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/31/2011 09:37 PM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > This patch adds some files, directories and changes in configure.ac and Makefile.am required to i18n support. > > The previous patch missed changes in configure.ac and Makefile.am, this is the correct one > > --- > Makefile.am | 4 +- > config.rpath | 672 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Why do we need config.rpath? What does it do in this context? > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 3fc02d0..aa7cc64 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ AC_PROG_LIBTOOL > > AC_LANG([C]) > > +#i18n > +AM_GNU_GETTEXT > +AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18]) > + > # Sanitize path > > if test "$prefix" = "NONE"; then > @@ -262,7 +266,7 @@ CPPFLAGS="$KERNEL_CPPFLAGS -I\$(top_builddir)/make -I\$(top_srcdir)/make \ > -I. $ENV_CPPFLAGS" > LDFLAGS="$ENV_LDFLAGS" > > -AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile > +AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile intl/Makefile po/Makefile.in > group/Makefile > group/libgfscontrol/Makefile > group/gfs_control/Makefile One per line, in alphabetical order please. Easier to track them. Same applies to Makefile.am addition for SUBDIRS and EXTRA_DIST. Is the build order important for po/intl vs code? Fabio