From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:00:04 +0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] davinci: dm6467/T EVM: pass reference clock rate to dm646x_init() In-Reply-To: <1307034677-27236-2-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> References: <1307034677-27236-1-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> <1307034677-27236-2-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> Message-ID: <4DEB7DD4.5050706@mvista.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 02-06-2011 21:11, Sekhar Nori wrote: > From: Bob Dunlop > The DM6467 and DM6467T EVMs use different reference clock > frequencies. This difference is currently supported by having > the SoC code call a public board routine which sets up the reference > clock frequency. This does not scale as more boards are added. > Instead, pass the reference clock frequency as a parameter > to dm646x_init(). Boards which do not need the default reference > clock changed can pass NULL to this function. > Signed-off-by: Bob Dunlop > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori > --- > I have marked Bob as the author of this patch since it is essentially > his idea. Hope he doesnt mind that :) I don't think you should ascribe *your* patch to Bob. There's Suggested-by: line if you want to credit Bob. WBR, Sergei