From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753449Ab1FGMxA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:53:00 -0400 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de ([85.158.177.45]:44869 "EHLO server655-han.de-nserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751898Ab1FGMw7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:52:59 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:52:59 EDT Message-ID: <4DEE1D96.6020208@profihost.ag> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:46:14 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: XFS problem in 2.6.32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-User-Auth: Auth by hostmaster@profihost.com through 85.158.179.66 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi List, i've massive problems with a machine using 2.6.32 kernel and XFS: I've desribed the problem here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg04984.html The reply on the XFS mailinglist was: http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg04994.html So who keeps track on which patches needs to get backported or not? And who will backport XFS fixes back to 2.6.32? Thanks! Please CC me i'm NOT on list. Regards, Stefan