From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753311Ab1FVGW2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:22:28 -0400 Received: from h1446028.stratoserver.net ([85.214.92.142]:34769 "EHLO mail.ahsoftware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752999Ab1FVGW0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:22:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4E018A70.1060706@ahsoftware.de> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:23:44 +0200 From: Alexander Holler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110501 Thunderbird/3.3a3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre CC: Alan Stern , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, lkml , Rabin Vincent Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,aligned(4) instead of removing the packed attribute References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 21.06.2011 22:41, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ... and also in this case, I was talking about proper use of the packed > attribute in general, not at all about a specific case. I wanted to > provide a broader view to some people who expressed doubts and > misunderstanding in the hope that the archive could keep this knowledge > base available. > > I apologize if that wasn't clear to you. If you meant the abomination writing one, thanks, but I never expressed doubts or misunderstandings. I said doubts may arise because the standard (C99) doesn't say anything about if or how structs are packed (or aligned). Alexander From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: holler@ahsoftware.de (Alexander Holler) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:23:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,aligned(4) instead of removing the packed attribute In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E018A70.1060706@ahsoftware.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On 21.06.2011 22:41, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ... and also in this case, I was talking about proper use of the packed > attribute in general, not at all about a specific case. I wanted to > provide a broader view to some people who expressed doubts and > misunderstanding in the hope that the archive could keep this knowledge > base available. > > I apologize if that wasn't clear to you. If you meant the abomination writing one, thanks, but I never expressed doubts or misunderstandings. I said doubts may arise because the standard (C99) doesn't say anything about if or how structs are packed (or aligned). Alexander