From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:55803 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753960Ab1FZOpc (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:45:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4E074609.5080500@openwrt.org> (sfid-20110626_165041_497979_A9307605) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:45:29 +0200 From: Felix Fietkau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Pommnitz CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] Performance regression between Madwifi/net80211 and ath5k/mac80211 References: <1308750102.64154.YahooMailRC@web161214.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (sfid-20110622_154146_913504_76736765) <1308750416.29571.10.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1308753669.17439.YahooMailRC@web161208.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1308754204.29571.15.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1308755270.21489.YahooMailRC@web161204.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1308755270.21489.YahooMailRC@web161204.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-06-22 5:07 PM, Joerg Pommnitz wrote: >> I guess you'll need more help from the HW people here. > > Bob, Bruno, Felix, Luis, Nick: Do you read? What mac80211/ath5k version did you use? If you're using the in-kernel ath5k from 2.6.38, then I'd suggest testing with a recent compat-wireless version. I made some bug fixes and performance improvements in April - and I think those went into 2.6.39. - Felix