From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP4: powerdomain data: Fix core mem states and missing cefuse flag Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4E0D9CDD.6090008@ti.com> References: <1308847544-2322-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <1308847544-2322-4-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:55304 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755161Ab1GAKJi (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:09:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: "Nayak, Rajendra" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Shilimkar, Santosh" On 7/1/2011 1:48 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Benoit Cousson wrote: > >> Since ES2.0, the core ocmram does not support a different state >> than the main power domain anymore during both ON and RET power >> domain state. >> Since PM is not supported at all in ES1.0, update the common >> structure. >> >> LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE is supported by the cefuse power domain but >> the flag was missing. >> Add the PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE in flags field. >> >> Indent all previous flags to be aligned with other fields. >> >> Update the TI copyright date to 2011. >> >> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson >> Cc: Paul Walmsley >> Cc: Rajendra Nayak >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar > > Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley > > I guess the CEFUSE LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE bit is in the Security TRM? Good question... but I think so. Benoit