From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:04:14 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm/master (updated)
In-Reply-To: <4E0DA8AE.5080601@aribaud.net>
References: <4E0C5B1F.3080608@aribaud.net>
	<CEA7AEB5-0F34-4490-B886-754C47BA7715@googlemail.com>
	<4E0D6CC1.7020604@aribaud.net> <4E0D9BFE.9080507@emk-elektronik.de>
	<4E0DA8AE.5080601@aribaud.net>
Message-ID: <4E0DA9AE.5090804@emk-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 01.07.2011 12:59, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 01/07/2011 12:05, Reinhard Meyer a ?crit :
> 
>>>> why is in the second block my clear name replaced by email address (as in the commits in atmel/master) but the mails have correct (UTF8-formattet) clear name in 'From:'?
>>>
>>> Hmm... Sorry for not having noticed this. Apparently, it is already so in u-boot-atmel/. I have just created a branch out of the current u-boot/master, run 'pwclient get 100074' and 'git am', and your name appears as normal.
>>>
>>> Reinhard, what commands did you use to applie these patches?
>>
>> ALWAYS using patchworks: Download mbox, git-am<the downloaded file>.
>>
>> Apparently it makes a difference where the mail originated from.
> 
> 
> If you mean it makes a difference whether you download the mbox or use pwclient, I just tried both and got exactly the same .patch file (except for an added "From patchwork" line at the top, due to the mbox format, and a git am of either file results in Andreas' full name and address being shown as author, as expected.
> 
> Seems like either "your" and "my" .patch files differ in some way, or our setups (system, locale, git configuration).
> 
>> Reinhard
> 
> Amicalement,

I mean that it makes no difference whether I get the .patch files by "mbox" or
by "pwclient".

What makes a difference is whether the patch was sent via googlemail or not.

Apparently the subtle differences lead to different interpretation by git-am.

If that is a configuration issue, I do now know where to look at.

Reinhard