From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754495Ab1GDFjY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:39:24 -0400 Received: from relay03.digicable.hu ([92.249.128.185]:58462 "EHLO relay03.digicable.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753333Ab1GDFjV (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:39:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1151BD.5010907@freemail.hu> Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:38:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9meth_M=E1rton?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; hu-HU; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090402 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Chang , Matt Mooney , Matt Chen CC: Greg KH , Matthew Wilcox , Max Vozeler , Joe Perches , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] USBIP protocol documentation References: <4DDBF8BD.3000603@freemail.hu> <20110524183448.GA18511@kroah.com> <4DDC142E.6070003@freemail.hu> <20110525031222.GB14290@haskell.muteddisk.com> <4DDC93D5.9070607@freemail.hu> <4DDDFDA7.6030900@freemail.hu> <4E097A32.1000504@freemail.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original: 94.21.49.34 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, Matt Chen and Matt Mooney, it looks like we four are actively dealing with the USBIP protocol documentation. David, are you working at the same place like Matt Chen? Then you can easily see what you two has been done and not working parallel on the same thing. I'm currently not actively modifying the USBIP protocol description. Matt Mooney wanted to restructure the USBIP protocol documentation. Matt, do you have anything already done? If yes, maybe it would be good if you could send it so David can do the changes on your version. If you haven't worked on it then please tell and David can add the necessary modifications he suggested. Regards, Márton Németh David Chang wrote: > Hi Németh, > > 2011/6/29 David Chang : >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your great effort. >> Just a little comment on UNLINK pdu size. [...] > Would you add this field into your path or should I send another patch > to add it?