From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:20:14 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/4] Add new folder and build system for SPL
In-Reply-To: <20110708134138.7040C126F38F@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1309352967-5719-1-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com>
	<1309883182-12854-1-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>
	<1309883182-12854-4-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>
	<20110708091721.79CCB126F38F@gemini.denx.de>
	<4E16EAE9.5070505@ti.com>
	<20110708123233.31C6B15794A4@gemini.denx.de>
	<4E16FD50.3090005@ti.com>
	<20110708130454.99AF3126F38F@gemini.denx.de>
	<4E170601.1080000@ti.com>
	<20110708134138.7040C126F38F@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4E170B16.1050107@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Friday 08 July 2011 07:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4E170601.1080000@ti.com>  you wrote:
>>
>> Symlinks, copies are not involved in either case. My question was this:
>> Where should something like 'nand_spl/nand_boot.c' go in the new
>> framework?
>>
>> 1) spl/nand/nand_boot.c OR
>> 2) drivers/nand/spl_nand_boot.c
>
> I have no strong preferences here...
>
>> (2) Helps in having:
>> SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl
>>
>> where as with (1) we have:
>> SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl/obj
>> and with this nand_boot.o will be in
>> (OBJTREE)/spl/obj/spl/nand/nand_boot.o !
>>
>> To me (2) looks cleaner, and goes well with the idea of having all
>> source files in the original source tree.
>
> Agreed.  But maybe we can remove a redundant "nand" from the file
> name, like this:
>
> 	drivers/nand/spl_boot.c
>
> ?

ok. Thanks.

best regards,
Aneesh