From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh0GR-000876-GF for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:18:11 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Qh0Cc-0002oX-BV from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:14:14 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:14:14 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.17] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:14:13 -0700 Message-ID: <4E1DA832.5030600@mentor.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:14:10 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1310556033.20015.1104.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1310556033.20015.1104.camel@rex> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2011 14:14:14.0144 (UTC) FILETIME=[24C83800:01CC4167] Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] commits for yocto.git tree for x32 work X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:18:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/13/2011 04:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:02 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote: >> From: Nitin A Kamble >> >> These are commits for yocto tree. I came up with as part of the x32 work. >> I think these commits does not belong in the x32 layer and should go >> in the yocto/oecore tree. >> >> The siteinfo.bbclass commit is a hacky way to get the the right siteinfo for >> x32 now. In the future a better solution will be implemented for that purpose. >> >> The following changes since commit 7354fc9213f27aa1b643dbe88070437f1ee4c063: >> >> insane.bbclass: skip rdepends QA checks for kernel / modules (2011-07-12 15:22:09 +0100) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib nitin/x32 >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/x32 >> >> Nitin A Kamble (5): >> siteinfo.bbclass: hack for x32 >> udev-172: add a newer version for newer kernel >> runqemu: support qemux32 machine > > These first three need a little more thought. They're fine to as proof > of concept work but we need to find better ways to integrate them. > > Specifically: > > The siteinfo change is a hack and can't be merged as is. We need to find > a way to change the target_arch or target_os in such a way we can signal > to siteinfo to do something different. I also wonder if using i686-linux > is actually correct for x32 in all cases since x32 does support 64 bit > data types. Hopefully this will be easier with the siteinfo dictionary bits we've got in oe.dev that I'm working on moving to oe-core (world finished overnight so time to diff the config.log's and kick off some of the automated tests). -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation