From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:27:11 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] Prototype for generic SPL framework
In-Reply-To: <20110714202552.552801593511@gemini.denx.de>
References: <4DF9B9E0.8020206@ti.com>
	<1310569869-31810-1-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>
	<20110714202552.552801593511@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4E1FF2D7.3010807@ti.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Friday 15 July 2011 01:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
>
> In message<1310569869-31810-1-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@googlemail.com>  you wrote:
>> This patch series is the final proposal from Aneesh and myself for a
>> generic SPL framework. The implementation already works and have been
>> tested with in-tree and out-of-tree builds. The latest feedback
>> from ML is already included.
>
> I read your patches, and except to the documentation commetns I
> already made I have but only one question (I did not spend enough time
> to figure this out myself, sorry):  Do you think the split of the
> patches is OK, i. e. do we maintain bisectability ?

I tried building after applying each patch one by one. There are no
errors or warnings.

best regards,
Aneesh