All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] fix regression from c/s 23735:537918f518ee
@ 2011-07-25  8:49 Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2011-07-25  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]

This was checking presence of the wrong (old) ELF note. I don't really
understand how this failed consistently only for one of the xen-boot
tests...

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>

--- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ int __init construct_dom0(struct domain 
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
+	if (parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_SUPPORTED_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
 	    !test_bit(XENFEAT_dom0, parms.f_supported))
 	{
 		printk("Kernel does not support Dom0 operation\n");
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ int __init construct_dom0(
         return -EINVAL;
     }
 
-    if ( parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
+    if ( parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_SUPPORTED_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
          !test_bit(XENFEAT_dom0, parms.f_supported) )
     {
         printk("Kernel does not support Dom0 operation\n");





[-- Attachment #2: guest-dom0-cap-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1058 bytes --]

This was checking presence of the wrong (old) ELF note. I don't really
understand how this failed consistently only for one of the xen-boot
tests...

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>

--- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ int __init construct_dom0(struct domain 
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
+	if (parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_SUPPORTED_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
 	    !test_bit(XENFEAT_dom0, parms.f_supported))
 	{
 		printk("Kernel does not support Dom0 operation\n");
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ int __init construct_dom0(
         return -EINVAL;
     }
 
-    if ( parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
+    if ( parms.elf_notes[XEN_ELFNOTE_SUPPORTED_FEATURES].type != XEN_ENT_NONE &&
          !test_bit(XENFEAT_dom0, parms.f_supported) )
     {
         printk("Kernel does not support Dom0 operation\n");

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-07-25  8:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-25  8:49 [PATCH] fix regression from c/s 23735:537918f518ee Jan Beulich

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.