From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754074Ab1GZWYK (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:24:10 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:41719 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754045Ab1GZWYI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:24:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2F3D94.4000401@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:20:04 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , benh@kernel.crashing.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] References: <1311694534-5161-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/26/2011 02:49 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> it passes test with my x86 64bits setups. > > Great, thanks for testing. > >> looks like tip/master does not include tip/x86/memblock and tip/x86/mm yet. >> >> So tip/x86/memblock, tip/x86/mm will not get into 3.1? > > Yeah, I think the whole thing including the last patchset was a bit > too late for this merge window. These are basically cleanups and > could possibly cause weird boot regressions, so having enough time in > -tip before going mainline seems like a good idea to me. > It seems a bit scary, so holding this until 3.2 would definitely be my preference. -hpa