From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qntsr-00051Y-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:54:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qntsq-0004FG-9s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:54:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qntsp-0004Ez-Us for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:54:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4E36BECA.60707@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:57:14 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1311914994-20482-1-git-send-email-devin122@gmail.com> <1311914994-20482-20-git-send-email-devin122@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1311914994-20482-20-git-send-email-devin122@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 19/24] qcow2: add qcow2_copy_header() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Devin Nakamura Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 29.07.2011 06:49, schrieb Devin Nakamura: > Signed-off-by: Devin Nakamura > --- > block/qcow2.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Do we really need to build a completely new header? We should already have one at a different offset that we only need to copy, no? Kevin