From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpEo1-0006My-Qm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:26:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpEo0-0001it-P2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:26:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpEo0-0001in-GT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:26:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4E3B9BE4.3020807@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:29:40 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Build broken List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Am 05.08.2011 08:22, schrieb malc: > > /home/malc/x/rcs/git/qemuorg/coroutine-ucontext.c: In function 'coroutine_new': > /home/malc/x/rcs/git/qemuorg/coroutine-ucontext.c:160:16: error: 'arg.i[1]' may be used uninitialized in this function > /home/malc/x/rcs/git/qemuorg/coroutine-ucontext.c:136:18: note: 'arg.i[1]' was declared here > > diff --git a/coroutine-ucontext.c b/coroutine-ucontext.c > index 41c2379..42dc3e2 100644 > --- a/coroutine-ucontext.c > +++ b/coroutine-ucontext.c > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static Coroutine *coroutine_new(void) > CoroutineUContext *co; > ucontext_t old_uc, uc; > jmp_buf old_env; > - union cc_arg arg; > + union cc_arg arg = {0}; > > /* The ucontext functions preserve signal masks which incurs a system call > * overhead. setjmp()/longjmp() does not preserve signal masks but only > > I guess gcc should yell not only here on ppc32 but on any machine where > pointer size is less than the size of two ints. Stefan, why does this code even exist again? I think at some point I had it changed to just use a static variable in order to avoid doing this kind of tricks with unions. Interestingly, the buildbot doesn't seem to have failed on i386. Kevin