From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4E43B7E8.5000302@domain.hid>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:07:20 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4E43B5FE.4040402@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4E43B5FE.4040402@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/options/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 08/11/2011 12:59 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I remember the recent gcc 4.6 issue on this list, but unfortunately,
> didn't have much time for attention. Now, it found its way to the Debian
> package: http://bugs.debian.org/637425
> 
> I wonder if it is a compiler bug or Xenomai's.

It looks like a xenomai bug due to the pseudo-signals implemented in
this branch. I have asked two persons which have this compiler to test
xenomai-head where these signals have been removed to confirm this
hypothesis, but received no answer as of today.

-- 
                                                                Gilles.