From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E43C056.9040007@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:43:18 +0200 From: Daniele Nicolodi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E43B5FE.4040402@domain.hid> <4E43B7E8.5000302@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4E43B7E8.5000302@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org On 11/08/11 13:07, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 08/11/2011 12:59 PM, Roland Stigge wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I remember the recent gcc 4.6 issue on this list, but unfortunately, >> didn't have much time for attention. Now, it found its way to the Debian >> package: http://bugs.debian.org/637425 >> >> I wonder if it is a compiler bug or Xenomai's. > > It looks like a xenomai bug due to the pseudo-signals implemented in > this branch. I have asked two persons which have this compiler to test > xenomai-head where these signals have been removed to confirm this > hypothesis, but received no answer as of today. Hello. I submitted the debian bug, beside what is the cause of the problem, binaries compiled with gcc-4.6 are not usable, but binaries compiled with gcc-4.4 are. I'm compiling xenomai-head right now (this requires compiling both user space and kernel space, so testing requires some more time). I'll let you know ASAP. Cheers, -- Daniele