From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: arch_set_info_guest() and cr1 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:17:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4E45DED5.40602@goop.org> References: <20110811190315.1cc6afab@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20110812150115.6047b8c2@mantra.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110812150115.6047b8c2@mantra.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Mukesh Rathor Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/12/2011 03:01 PM, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > Ah I see it, during save/restore, it is used. > Well, I'm trying to keep the option of using PV paging with hybrid, so > I may need to honor that. But that's phase 2. Though it would be nice to re-enable the use of PV writable pagetables to get access to HAP, and we could do without that. Does Xen require that the user pagetable be a proper subset of the kernel pagetable? If we can assume that and get proper ring protections in the HVM container, then we can simply ignore the user pagetable (and would have to if we want to get good syscall performance). J