From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4E53949C.7050804@invoxia.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:53:00 +0200 From: Arnaud Mouiche MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz CC: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: HFP gateway and new incoming connection References: <4E528879.5080103@invoxia.com> <20110822174912.GA21949@joana> <4E536DFF.8050205@invoxia.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/23/2011 01:14 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Arnaud Mouiche > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 08/22/2011 09:58 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: >>> [...] >>> Yep, we have some plans to move the Agent registration to adapter >>> path, so it gonna be per adapter. This is necessary to set the >>> features bit properly in the record and probably gonna support both >>> roles (with different agents). My initial idea was to use Media API, >>> but perhaps is confusing since HFP is not entirely about audio but >>> call control too (mostly) so perhaps we gonna have a different >>> interface for it e.g. org.bluez.Telephony, in addition to that we are >>> planning to pass the endpoint bus and path together in the >>> NewConnection so the telephony agent (oFono) can communicate directly >>> to endpoint in use (PulseAudio). >>> >>> Those are my plans, but none of this is set in stone and Im pretty >>> open for ideas >>> >> what about using the org.bluez.Adapter / RegisterAgent API, and add: >> - the possibility to setup multiple agents (maintain a list of agents) >> - use the "capability" field as a filter definition to find the good agent >> for the particular request >> ex: >> audio/gateway.c::agent_sendfd() will look for a agent in the list, with a >> "HFP" capability to send the "NewConnection" request > I guess it would be confusing since with the same method we would have > different types of agents which implements different interfaces, there > is also the problem that by using Adapter interface it would have to > be implemented in the core daemon but my intention is to maintain this > inside the audio plugin to hook with Media API. > You are right. I didn't see how the core was compartmentalized from plugins. I need took more closely to the Media API... arnaud