From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98CCB6F9D for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:12:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4E53D15D.2050807@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:12:13 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthieu CASTET Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip References: <1313634783-8855-1-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <4E4D3CE0.7020602@freescale.com> <4E5366AF.7040108@freescale.com> <4E537AC4.6000301@parrot.com> In-Reply-To: <4E537AC4.6000301@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , LiuShuo , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Li Yang-R58472 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/23/2011 05:02 AM, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > LiuShuo a =C3=A9crit : >> We can't read the NOP from the ID on any chip. Some chips don't >> give this infomation.(e.g. Micron MT29F4G08BAC) Are there any 4K+ chips (especially ones with insufficient NOP) that don't have the info? This chip is 2K and NOP8. Is there an easy way (without needing to have every datasheet for every chip ever made) to determine at runtime which chips supply this informati= on? > Doesn't the micron chip provide it with onfi info ? This chip doesn't appear to be ONFI. -Scott From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.14] helo=TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QvtaR-000629-9J for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:12:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4E53D15D.2050807@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:12:13 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthieu CASTET Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip References: <1313634783-8855-1-git-send-email-b35362@freescale.com> <4E4D3CE0.7020602@freescale.com> <4E5366AF.7040108@freescale.com> <4E537AC4.6000301@parrot.com> In-Reply-To: <4E537AC4.6000301@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , LiuShuo , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Li Yang-R58472 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/23/2011 05:02 AM, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > LiuShuo a =C3=A9crit : >> We can't read the NOP from the ID on any chip. Some chips don't >> give this infomation.(e.g. Micron MT29F4G08BAC) Are there any 4K+ chips (especially ones with insufficient NOP) that don't have the info? This chip is 2K and NOP8. Is there an easy way (without needing to have every datasheet for every chip ever made) to determine at runtime which chips supply this informati= on? > Doesn't the micron chip provide it with onfi info ? This chip doesn't appear to be ONFI. -Scott