All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Broken pci_block_user_cfg_access interface
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:43:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E54D5D7.8050807@siemens.com> (raw)

Hi,

trying to port the generic device interrupt masking pattern of
uio_pci_generic to KVM's device assignment code, I stumbled over some
fundamental problem with the current pci_block/unblock_user_cfg_access
interface: it does not provide any synchronization between blocking
sides. This allows user space to trigger a kernel BUG, just run two

while true; do echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<some-device>/reset; done

loops in parallel and watch the kernel oops.

Instead of some funky open-coded locking mechanism, we would rather need
a plain mutex across both the user space access (via sysfs) and the
sections guarded by pci_block/unblock_user_cfg_access so far. But I'm
not sure which of them already allow sleeping, specifically if the IPR
driver would be fine with such a change. Can someone in the CC list
comment on this?

uio_pci_generic would definitely not be able to sleep as it takes the
lock from (potentially hard) IRQ context. This particular use case, RMW
of command/status word, requires a separate mechanism. I'm considering
to introduce a dedicated raw spinlock with IRQ protection for that
words, maybe also a PCI core service to abstract INTx testing and masking.

Any further thoughts on how to resolve this issue?

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24 10:43 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-08-24 15:02 ` Broken pci_block_user_cfg_access interface Brian King
2011-08-25  9:19   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25  9:40     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 10:34       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:06       ` Brian King
2011-08-25 13:12         ` Brian King
2011-08-25 13:16           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:24             ` Brian King
2011-08-25 18:16               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 13:02     ` Brian King
2011-08-25 13:06       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 18:19         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 18:52           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 19:07             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 19:26               ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 15:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-29 15:42   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 15:58     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-29 16:14       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 16:23         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-29 16:26           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 18:47     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 19:18       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-30 16:30         ` Brian King
2011-08-30 18:01           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-30 19:41             ` Brian King
2011-09-02  7:48         ` [RFC] pci: Rework config space blocking services Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06  7:00           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06  7:18             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06  8:04               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06  8:27                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06  8:47                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06  8:48                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 13:46           ` Brian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E54D5D7.8050807@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.