From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752099Ab1HXOCk (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:02:40 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:58538 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751194Ab1HXOCh (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:02:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4E550479.3070809@monstr.eu> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:02:33 +0200 From: Michal Simek Reply-To: monstr@monstr.eu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleg Nesterov CC: Matt Fleming , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/43] microblaze: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() References: <1313772419-21951-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> <1313772419-21951-18-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> <4E54BB02.6060404@monstr.eu> <1314181287.3611.17.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <20110824135306.GA7828@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110824135306.GA7828@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/24, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:49 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> v2 of this patch depends on "[PATCH 01/43] signal: Add block_sigmask() >>>> for adding sigmask to current->blocked" so they need to go through the >>>> same tree but this patch would benefit from some maintainer ACK's. >>> Please add there my ACK to it too. > > Thanks Michal. > >>> I will add patches 14-16/43 v2 to microblaze next branch keep them >>> for a while. I will propose them to Linus tree for v3.2. >> Actually, I just realised this is where it gets a little complicated. If >> you take those 3 patches and they're not in Oleg's tree, [PATCH 17/43] >> doesn't apply cleanly. Fixing 17/43 up so it applies without patches >> 14-16 would result in something like this in handle_signal(), >> >> if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) { >> block_sigmask(ka, sig); >> } >> return 1; >> >> Which Linus would have to fixup to its original form when he merges the >> two trees. I think all the microblaze patches should go through Oleg's >> tree, > > Agreed, this looks simpler. > > Michal, unless you object, I am going to add the microblaze changes > (with your acks) to ptrace branch, it already has 01/43 which adds > block_sigmask(). > > OK? No problem. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Microblaze U-BOOT custodian